logo

56 pages 1 hour read

Bottle of Lies: The Inside Story of the Generic Drug Boom

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2019

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Part 5Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Part 5: “Detectives in the Dark”

Part 5, Chapter 18 Summary: “Congress Wakes Up”

When congressional investigator David Nelson found out about the motion filed by Maryland prosecutors, he wondered why he hadn’t been informed about it earlier. He had asked the FDA if the previous raid on Ranbaxy headquarters had to do with drug quality and the FDA told him it had nothing to do with that.

The Ranbaxy case reminded him of his experiences in the 1980s, when the FDA was overwhelmed with foreign products and full of agents willing to take bribes in gifts in exchange for turning a blind eye to potential violations. Nelson also noted another similarity: Many of the companies that were involved in generic drug scandals were headed by South Asians.

Part 5, Chapter 19 Summary: “Solving for X”

Dr. Harry Lever was a cardiologist who started to notice that his patients weren’t reacting well to generic drugs. This spurred him to research generic drugs and help his hospital compile a list of generic drugs to avoid.

Generic drugs were especially ineffective, or even dangerous, in the case of “narrow therapeutic index drugs,” where small differences in dose or concentration can have a significant impact on a patient’s response (241).

However, in the FDA’s tests of generic drugs, they continued to find generics to be bioequivalent with their name-brand counterparts.

Part 5, Chapter 20 Summary: “A Test of Endurance”

FDA agents experienced tension with Justice Department lawyers while working on the Ranbaxy case. Each side blamed the other for stalling the investigation. One incident involved a document that FDA agents compiled outlining their case against Ranbaxy. The agents had the Justice Department prosecutors agree not to share this document with Ranbaxy, but one of the lawyers shared it with them anyway.

As the two sides fought, President Obama signed the ACA, the Affordable Care Act, into law, which put pressure on the FDA to approve generic drugs faster and increase competition in the market. The agents wanted a settlement with Ranbaxy to start at $1.6 billion but by 2011, Ranbaxy’s lawyers eventually reduced the sum to $260 million.

In the meantime, Thakur started a new company called Sciformix that focused on providing pharmacovigilance and risk management services to pharmaceutical companies. He also spent much of his time helping Beato’s firm with the case. Thakur and Sonal’s marriage continued to experience strain as he lived and worked in the United States and spent so much of his time and energy on the Ranbaxy case.

Part 5, Chapter 21 Summary: “A Deep, Dark Well”

Joe and Terry Graedon were hosts of the NPR program The People’s Pharmacy. The Graedons were advocates of generic drugs and initially believed that the FDA was a “competent regulator whose claims could be believed” (259). However, over the years, they started hearing from listeners that their generic drugs weren’t working as expected—they were ineffective or even caused dangerous side effects.

Joe Graedon studied the FDA’s definition of bioequivalence. He noted that the curve used by the FDA to determine bioequivalence of generic drugs was too lenient, allowing for a wider range of variability in drug absorption compared to brand-name drugs.

Patients taking the generic version of the name-brand drug Wellbutrin XL, a drug used to treat depression, started writing in to the Graedons complaining of negative side effects, including sudden suicidal tendencies. The Gradeons alerted the FDA, but their claims were brushed off. It took five years before the FDA acted and recalled the product.

Eban describes other instances of customers finding generic drugs to be suspicious: Patients described rotten smells and bottles with eyelashes and bugs inside them. One woman even found a live centipede in one of her capsules.

Part 5, Chapter 22 Summary: “The $600 Million Jacket”

Karen Takahashi, a compliance officer at the FDA, was tasked with evaluating Ranbaxy’s application to create a generic version of Lipitor, or atorvastatin.

The FDA eventually decided to impose an AIP on Poanta Sahib, which shut down atorvastatin and other applications, but this left Ranbaxy free to move manufacturing to other plants.

The FDA debated with prosecutors over how to proceed against Ranbaxy. Some worried that if the FDA did not approve the atorvastatin application, then Ranbaxy wouldn’t make enough money to pay the government a huge settlement. Meanwhile, US Senators were pressuring the FDA to approve the drug quickly.

Eventually, the FDA approved the application for atorvastatin from Ranbaxy, despite the concerns surrounding the company. Ranbaxy made a significant amount of revenue: $100 million in the first 2 hours, and $600 million during the six-month exclusivity period.

Part 5 Analysis

In Part 5, Eban addresses crucial aspects related to the pharmaceutical industry, regulatory bodies, and the challenges faced by whistleblowers.

Eban exposes the limitations and faults within the FDA, particularly regarding its oversight of generic drugs, raising the issue of The Importance of Manufacturing Safeguards. The experiences of Dr. Harry Lever, a cardiologist, highlight discrepancies between healthcare professionals’ concerns about generic drug efficacy, especially in narrow therapeutic index drugs, and the FDA’s assurance of bioequivalence. Lever “developed a sense for which drugs, or which companies, to avoid. Ranbaxy was among them” (236). Lever came to this conclusion based on his patients’ experiences and his own intuition.

Meanwhile, the FDA, an organization with much more power, data, and knowledge, avoided taking action against Ranbaxy. The internal debates within the FDA regarding the approval of Ranbaxy’s generic version of Lipitor emphasize the complex dynamics involving financial interests, regulatory responsibilities, and political pressures. The approval of the atorvastatin application despite concerns about Ranbaxy’s practices illustrates the intricate and sometimes conflicting factors at play in the regulatory landscape. Additionally, the FDA’s lackluster response to patient complaints about generic drugs, including instances of contamination, indicates a potential gap in its regulatory practices.

The tension between FDA agents and Justice Department lawyers also underscores internal conflicts that hinder investigations. The unauthorized sharing of case details further reveals lapses in confidentiality and cooperation. Eban also emphasizes the prolonged and challenging process involved in taking regulatory action against a fraudulent company like Ranbaxy. The reduction of the settlement amount from $1.6 billion to $260 million showcases the intricate negotiations and compromises required in legal, financial, and regulatory considerations.

Dinesh Thakur’s journey as a whistleblower continues to add a human dimension to the narrative, illustrating the personal toll on individuals who expose pharmaceutical fraud. As Thakur establishes a new company and dedicates significant time to the Ranbaxy case, strains on his marriage and personal life become evident. Thakur’s experiences highlight the sacrifices and challenges faced by those who take on the responsibility of exposing fraudulent practices within the pharmaceutical industry.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 56 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools