49 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Background
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Character Analysis
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
Content Warning: The source text references multiple deaths by suicide and deals with the psychological effects of trauma, loss, and grief. It also uses stigmatizing and potentially offensive language to refer to people experiencing mental illness.
Lock Every Door explores the Psychological Effects of Isolation and Loneliness via protagonist Jules Larsen’s experiences at the Bartholomew. Jules takes the Bartholomew apartment-sitting job because she doesn’t have a family, partner, home, or job. Therefore, Jules is in an alienated position at the outset of the novel. Jules’s eagerness for companionship leads her to trust the Bartholomew’s residents and dismiss Chloe’s concerns. However, when Jules starts probing into the Bartholomew’s mysterious history, she begins to realize how isolated she truly is. The Bartholomew and its residents prey upon isolated and lonely individuals like Jules. Before Jules agrees to take the Bartholomew job, Leslie interviews her, probing into her social connections to ensure that she does not have a support system. Further, in Chapter 30, Jules and Dylan realize that none of the apartment sitters have family. Through this, Riley Sager illustrates the ways in which isolation opens people up to manipulation and other vulnerabilities. The building’s rules against associating with permanent residents further isolates the apartment sitters, effectively estranging them from society.
Though the Bartholomew’s permanent tenants initially feel trustworthy and kind to Jules, the longer she remains there, the more alone, confused, and lost she feels. Her initial, hopeful connections with Greta and Nick seem to offer companionship, guidance, and intimacy where she has had none. They pose as the archetypal guides in her story, Greta as a wise artist and Nick as a respectable doctor, clouding her perception. As the building’s dark underbelly become exposed and tenants begin to turn cold, Jules’s fellow apartment sitters also begin to disappear, leaving her with an acute sense of alienation. Ingrid and Dylan both disappear, and even Chloe becomes unreachable. By the time Jules begins to understand what’s really going on at the Bartholomew, she is entirely alone, with no one to go to for help or to corroborate her version of events. This, along with the social stigma surrounding people with mental illness, is why Jules is determined not “to sound crazy” when she conveys her story to Dr. Wagner, Bernard, and their attendants (206). As a social outcast presumed to be experiencing mental illness, her story is considered less reliable. The novel suggests that without social connections to back them up, individuals are less likely to be believed. Jules can’t reclaim her autonomy over her life or build community if society has deemed her a pariah.
When Jules realizes the precarious position her isolation has put her in, she fights hard to preserve those she has made at the Bartholomew. She investigates Ingrid’s disappearance at great risk to herself and despite assurances that nothing is wrong. That effort leads her to make friends with Dylan, Bobbie, and, eventually, Ingrid. Those friendships, in turn, help her to see the truth about the Bartholomew. By the end of the novel, Jules learns to make friends and accept their help. In Chapter 56, Jules lives a new life defined by balanced friendships. Surviving the Bartholomew teaches her the importance of building connections. Jules’s loss of her sister and parents began a struggle to maintain friendships and trust others. Her Bartholomew experiences disrupt this habit of withdrawing from others and creates new pathways to connection and community.
Throughout the novel, the Bartholomew embodies the deceptive world that Jules must navigate to pursue the truth about Ingrid’s disappearance. Because Jules’s life has been defined by secrets and tragedy, she wants to believe in the Bartholomew as a symbol of a pure, idyllic life. However, Jules’s desire to remain positive and to see the good in her new circumstances effectively blocks her from seeing the truth of her dangerous new world. However, Jules overcomes these challenges to uncover the truth of the Bartholomew, and her traumatic childhood gives her a devotion to the truth.
No matter their backgrounds, people, including Jules, actively uphold the Bartholomew’s deceptions because they all have something to gain, obscuring Jules’s perception of the place. The Bartholomew reminds Jules of her childhood, during which her sister read her Heart of a Dreamer, which takes place in the famed building. When Jules first starts getting to know characters like Heart of a Dreamer author Greta Manville, physician Nick Bartholomew, and actor Marianne Duncan, she dismisses their odd behaviors, trusting them implicitly as well-known and well-respected members of the elite class. True to the psychological thriller genre, the antagonists pose as kindly guides, but gradually begin to gaslight Jules and thus to distort her sense of truth. In part because she wishes to improve her own socioeconomic circumstances, Jules maintains this illusion by accepting at face value the way the residents present themselves. Further, she ignores red flags about the building and its residents, telling herself she is imagining things and effectively deceiving herself so that she can keep her childhood fantasy alive. For example, Jules does not question the Bartholomew’s stringent rules about keeping away from the permanent residents or Leslie’s strange questions about her social circle, because she wants the benefits that she believes working in the building will bring. Further, she dismisses the building’s frightening history because it is so nice, wondering why Ingrid would want to leave. Over time, however, the characters begin to reveal their true intentions and thus how they have manipulated Jules’s perception of the building. The turning point, when Jules realizes that Nick has Ingrid’s phone, reflects this in particular, as Jules can no longer deny that something nefarious is going on and the building’s residents are not trustworthy. Even Charlie, the door attendant, is in on the organ transplant scheme, hoping to procure one of Jules’s organs for his daughter.
Sager suggests that Jules’s ultimate escape from and exposure of the Bartholomew relates in part to her traumatic childhood, particularly her sister’s disappearance. In Chapter 22, when Chloe tells Jules that locating Ingrid won’t solve the mystery of Jane’s disappearance, Jules acknowledges that this is true. However, having lived her life under the cloud of her sister’s disappearance, Jules cannot stomach the thought of leaving Ingrid another inexplicably vanished individual. Her inability to find Jane motivates her pursuit of the truth in the narrative present. Finding Ingrid and uncovering the Bartholomew’s exploitative ventures are Jules’s ways of reclaiming her autonomy and using her agency to expose dangerous realities that threaten those like her. When Jules “watch[es] the wrecking ball swing” toward the Bartholomew in the novel’s closing scene (368), she is watching the symbolic destruction of the lies that threatened her. The building’s demolition is symbolic of the truth overcoming deception.
Jules’s experiences at the Bartholomew fuel the novel’s explorations of the Wealthy–Vulnerable Power Dynamics. Jules represents the vulnerable, lower classes, while the Bartholomew’s residents represent the powerful, upper classes. In the early sections of the novel, Jules’s desire for socioeconomic advancement leads her to abandon Chloe for life at the Bartholomew, where she initially accepts residents’ superiority. When, eventually, she uncovers the truth, she realizes that the wealthy residents of the Bartholomew take advantage of her vulnerability and hope for a better life to manipulate her. Though some of them may seem kind, they only behave that way because she is useful to them.
Initially, Jules believes that the Bartholomew’s “reputation for secrecy” originates from a belief that the economically advantaged and disadvantaged should not occupy the same social spheres (19). She seems to accept this reasoning to some extent, feeling like an outsider as soon as she enters the Bartholomew for her tour. Her belief in the value of wealthy people over poor ones reveals itself clearly through her sense of embarrassment from buying off-brand “poor-people” foods. Jules’s life up to this point is limited by living in a society that disadvantages the socioeconomically vulnerable. She knows that she doesn’t belong among the wealthy, elite tenants, but accepts the apartment-sitting position in an attempt to exact financial security. Jules initially scoffs at Chloe’s concerns about the Bartholomew’s unsettling history, wanting to believe the Bartholomew offers her an avenue out of her circumstances. “Life,” she believes, “is offering [her] a building-size reset button,” which she intends “to press [...] as hard as [she] can” (25). However, the economic disparity between herself and her fellow Bartholomew occupants inevitably creates an imbalance of power, with apartment sitters trying to please permanent residents. This imbalance in turn dictates many of the novel’s primary interpersonal and atmospheric conflicts.
Jules’s financial, vocational, and social vulnerability become increasingly clear to her the longer she stays at the Bartholomew. As she slowly realizes that the permanent residents are manipulating her, her powerlessness in these relationships becomes clear. Through the Bartholomew’s black-market-organ-transplant scheme, the author suggests that wealthy classes exploit the vulnerable for their own gain in deeply cruel and dehumanizing ways, literally consuming and dissecting the bodies of the poor for their own gain. The Bartholomew’s residents exploit apartment sitters’ isolation and financial vulnerability to lure, ensnare, and ultimately kill them. They do so because they believe that “the truly important people in the world deserve to live longer lives than those who are beneath them” (330). The author presents the Bartholomew as a microcosm of US socioeconomic structure, using the Bartholomew to illustrate the imbalanced power dynamics that threaten underprivileged classes in the United States, particularly in regard to healthcare. Jules symbolically escapes the social strictures that have entrapped her and her family throughout her life when she escapes the Bartholomew in the final sequences of the novel. The novel closes with developers tearing down the Bartholomew, an image that echoes the ouroboros: a snake that destroys itself in order to make a new life. The building’s demolition creates potential for something new and signifies the possibility of disrupting America’s class disparities in order to create a new and more equitable system.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
By Riley Sager