logo

52 pages 1 hour read

Social Intelligence: The New Science of Human Relationships

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2006

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Part 2, Chapters 7-9Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Part 2: “Broken Bonds”

Chapter 7 Summary: “You and It”

Part 2 opens with an anecdote in which a woman, grieving the loss of her sister, receives a sympathy call from a friend who lost his own sister some years before. She gratefully relays her emotions to her friend but suddenly realizes that she can hear the clicks of the friend’s computer keys as he answers emails. She begins to notice that his responses no longer make complete sense, and he grows more detached as the call goes on. She ends the call, feeling more alone than she did before.

Goleman uses this story to illustrate a type of interaction that the philosopher Martin Buber called “I/it.” In an I/it interaction, one person has no real attunement or empathy to the other person. This detachment can be polite, affording one subject privacy or distance, or it can be cruel, exploiting the other’s vulnerabilities as they search for real connection.

In contrast to the I/it relationship, Buber posits the “I/you” interaction, an empathic, attuned, attentive relationship in which both participants feel the mutual warmth of rapport.

Goleman brings up the Japanese concept of amae, or warm connection that anticipates and fulfills another’s needs before they request it. Goleman warns, however, that “short of sainthood” (110), no one can connect to everyone as an I/you.

Goleman offers up two examples of the I/it relationship: The first describes a journalist who maintains appropriate professional distance from his subject, while the second describes a patient at a teaching hospital who is woken up in her cot by a doctor and his residents, stripped naked, and used to teach the students about carcinoma using her body as a reference. These two forms of I/it relationships show the range of morality in this form of interaction.

Chapter 8 Summary: “The Dark Triad”

The chapter begins with an anecdote about Goleman’s brother-in-law, a true crime buff who once visited a serial killer in prison and asked him how he could do such a thing to another person: Didn’t he feel pity for them? The serial killer replied that he had to “turn that part of [him] off” to commit the acts (117).

Goleman points to the ability to turn off empathy as a defining trait for the “dark triad” of social pathologies: narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy.

To explain narcissism, Goleman uses the example of a talented football player who seeks glory and adoration through tough plays and spectacular catches but eschews teamwork and even gets angry at teammates who pass to anyone other than him.

Goleman points out that “garden-variety narcissism” can be beneficial in stressful situations when performance counts most (118). However, when narcissists lack the ability to consider others, they become obsessed with being admired and purposefully sabotage others in order to feel superior to them. Narcissists can also become enraged when denied something to which they believe themselves entitled, and they can become violent in the service of rectifying the perceived slight. Goleman additionally points out that some organizations can operate narcissistically, becoming a “moral universe of [their] own” and covering up abuse, corruption, or disaster in order to maintain their image (122).

The Machiavellian, or “Mach,” uses manipulation to achieve their ends. Machs often see relationships as purely utilitarian, exploiting and discarding people as they go. Machs are often cunning, charming, and confident and can rise high in people-facing careers like politics or sales.

Psychopaths, unlike narcissists or Machs, feel a total lack of empathy for others. The psychopath is incapable of anything other than the I/it relationship. They have trouble recognizing emotions on other people’s faces and often feel little to no anxiety or fear.

While these sketches present each trait as a personality unto itself, Goleman points out that, in reality, these traits overlap and exist in a spectrum, with many people exhibiting some narcissistic or Machiavellian tendencies in combination with more positive forms of social intelligence. While social cognition is necessary for building richer, more connected lives, Goleman uses the concept of the dark triad to show how people can also use social cognition in a negative and antisocial way to manipulate others and to acquire what they want.

Chapter 9 Summary: “Mindblind”

This chapter tells a story from the life of Richard Borcherds, a professor of mathematics at Cambridge University and winner of the prestigious Fields Medal. At a gathering of friends, Richard finds the conversation overwhelming and confusing. He can’t follow the quick synchrony of his friends’ nonverbal signs. It’s all too confusing, and he retreats into his study.

Later in his life, Richards begins to suspect that he might have autism. Testing confirms this diagnosis. Richard mainly struggles with his lack of empathic accuracy: He cannot easily sense the emotions other people are feeling.

Through this story, Goleman introduces the concepts of “mindsight” and “mindblindness”: the ability or inability to sense the feelings of others. Goleman states that when a person is mindblind, they can find it difficult to establish rapport with others and may feel incapable of fully engaging in I/you relationships.

Goleman refers to Simon Baron-Cohen, head of autism research at Cambridge, and his theory that autism spectrum disorders represent the “extreme male brain” (139), which is adept at systemization and poor at empathy. (Note: This theory has been widely contested in the autistic community and among autism researchers.)

Goleman ends this chapter by describing a Cambridge study that used MRIs to detect activity in the brains of people with autism when engaging in social interaction. The subjects’ amygdalas appeared to be much more active than neurotypical people’s in the same context, implying a higher rate of inherent anxiety in social situations.

Part 2, Chapters 7-9 Analysis

Part 2 introduces philosopher Martin Buber’s concept of “I/you” and “I/it” relationships in social interactions. This concept is often framed as an ethical one: The I/it relationship is synonymous with objectification, which is commonly understood as inherently unethical in that it reduces the other person to an object—either an instrument for or an obstacle to the fulfillment of the subject’s desires. Goleman approaches these two types of relationships more neutrally, considering how each fits into The Neurobiology of Relationship Dynamics. From this perspective, I/it relationships are often necessary, as it would be socially exhausting and unsustainable to engage with every single person encountered as a “you.” I/it relationships provide a more sustainable solution for perfunctory social interaction. I/it relationships can maintain professional distance and provide both parties with privacy and dignity, but Goleman is careful to point out that they can also dehumanize a person and leave them feeling like nothing.

The ability to view one person as a “you” and another as an “it” highlights the flexibility and complexity of social interaction. More worryingly, though, it points to the human ability to purposefully tamp down empathy in order to commit acts of cruelty. When Goleman introduces Delroy Paulhus and Kevin Williams’s concept of the “dark triad,” he links it to the I/it relationship, showing how narcissistic, Machiavellian, and psychopathic behaviors all rely on the ability to suppress empathy, viewing the other person as an “it” rather than a “you.”

However, Goleman then introduces an anecdote about Richard, a brilliant mathematician who is nevertheless totally baffled by the complexities and details of social interaction. He is subsequently diagnosed with autism, and many of Richard’s eccentricities start to make sense in the light of being on the spectrum. In Richard’s case, the “mindblindness” is benign and only negatively affects himself. His mindblindness does not lead him to engage in psychopathic behavior, implying that psychopathy involves more maladaptation than just mindblindness.

Goleman points out that children are also not born with inherent mindsight and their mindsight develops incrementally year by year as they comprehend that other people are different from them and have different experiences. He also warns that neurotypical people can also engage in selective mindblindness.

Goleman then considers the theory that people with autism have what Simon Baron-Cohen refers to as “extreme male brain” (139), skilled at systematizing but poor at empathy. Goleman is careful to point out, however, that for the majority of people, men’s and women’s brains are in the same ability ranges for systematizing and empathy, and male and female brains are much more similar than they are different. The “extreme male brain” theory, though supported by autistic advocate Temple Grandin, is currently contested by the autistic community as too reductive and as a factor in women with autism going undiagnosed based on that understanding.

The variability in I/it relationships, ranging from benign to cruel, shows the complexity of large-scale social interaction and the ways in which neurobiology accommodates for that.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 52 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools