30 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Character Analysis
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
Jessie is intellectual and sensible. She skipped third grade, leading her to be in the same class as her older brother, Evan. She wears a backpack as it is “more practical” (6), even though it’s not fashionable among the girls at her school, showing her to be someone who prioritizes pragmatism over popularity.
Jessie loves rules, believing that they guarantee fair treatment for all. Ironically, the court case she orchestrates to bring Scott to justice is unfair in many ways. Jessie is a dynamic character who changes and develops throughout the story. She learns that she needs to relinquish control and uphold her principles of fair treatment for everyone.
Her maturation is evident when she concedes that Megan did the right thing in representing Scott, even though Megan also thought that Scott had stolen the money. Jessie admits that she was overly motivated in trying to win rather than being invested in a genuinely fair trial. Her yoga-loving grandma cautions her that she can’t control everything, and she needs to relax and let things unfold rather than trying to “run the whole world” (132). After Megan leaves, Jessie chants “be the tree” (136), a saying of her grandma’s that symbolizes her attempt to be a relaxed and accepting observer rather than one who wants to control her world.
Evan is Jessie’s older brother. They are both in Grade 4-O. Evan resents that his younger sister has been accelerated to join his class, and he worries that her exceptional intellectualism makes him seem stupid by comparison, likening it to being best friends with a star basketballer. Evan is in love with Megan, Jessie’s morally upstanding friend. He also loves basketball and spends hours practicing shots.
Evan and Jessie are industrious, evidenced by their hard work running a lemonade stand over the summer. Evan’s preoccupation with Scott’s financial situation implies that Evan’s family is of more modest means. The theft of the lemonade money hits hard, especially since the money was not entirely Evan’s. The reader is not told why Evan was carrying around the money; perhaps he wanted the feeling of wealth in his pocket for the first time or wanted to lord it over his friends. Whatever the reason, it’s clear that Evan is already aware of the power of money in its absence and presence.
Evan behaves angrily and immaturely toward Scott after he is found not guilty in the trial. To his credit, he later reflects on this behavior and feels guilty, which leads him to make amends. While there, Evan realizes that his envy of Scott—whom he believed always got his way—was misplaced. Scott’s family may have more money, but it doesn’t keep Scott’s father from raging at his son. In a moment of empathy and compassion, Evan realizes that not everything is perfect in Scott’s world, which leads him to apologize, an act that compels Scott to confess and return the money.
Scott, also a member of 4-O, is an outspoken student with a disregard for the rules. Scott’s family is rich, which Evan, among others, resents. Scott’s life of relative indulgence is characterized by the fact that he “never had to rake because his family had a service that took care of the yard” (140) and in his huge TV and brand-new Xbox console (140). Scott did indeed steal the money from Evan’s shorts. When Evan treats Scott with kindness and compassion after his father’s cruelty, Scott returns the money and apologizes for stealing it. Although Scott was in the wrong in committing the crime he was accused of, this interaction reveals that Scott is a more dynamic character than Evan or Jessie previously gave him credit for—he clearly feels remorse.
Megan, Jessie’s friend, is the story’s moral compass. Jessie outwardly proclaims her interests in fairness but treats Scott unfairly at the trial. On the other hand, Megan represents Scott at the trial because she knows that “in a real court of law, everyone has the right to a lawyer. So somebody had to stand up for Scott” (135). Megan does this even though she suspects Scott of stealing the money, illustrating a more genuine attempt at impartiality than Jessie displays.
Megan crosses her arms in disapproval when Evan aggressively beats Scott at the basketball hoop-shooting game. Later she leaves, deeming Evan’s violence towards the less talented Scott as “gross.” This rejection of violence further characterizes her as highly ethical and mature.
Grandma is Jessie’s voice of reason, helping her learn important lessons from the unsuccessful trial. Grandma counsels Jessie that she can’t “run the whole world” (132), helping her understand that she could not control the trial’s results (132). Grandma loves yoga and counsels Jessie to “be the tree” (136), a relaxed and accepting observer.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
By Jacqueline Davies