logo

47 pages 1 hour read

The War for Kindness: Building Empathy in a Fractured World

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2019

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapter 7-AppendicesChapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 7 Summary: “The Digital Double Edge”

Zaki begins Chapter 7 by discussing how “technology is widely viewed as our era’s biggest threat to empathy” (145). One reason for this view is that technology reduces in-person interactions. The internet provides a space for people to be emotionally distant and hide. For example, strangers willingly shot Iraqi artist Wafaa Bilal over 60,000 times for 30 days with a loud paintball gun; on a separate occasion, a drone-directed missile strike killed Bilal’s brother. Bilal wanted to show the world how easy it was to kill when sat behind a screen. Although the shooting was part of his art exhibit, it still proved his point: People are willing to cause destruction when they do not see its ramifications in-person.

The internet also makes it more difficult for humans to understand each other’s emotions. There is a correlation between internet usage and a country’s level of empathy. Countries with a higher rate of internet usage have a lower level of empathy. Zaki notes that “when people read each other’s words, as opposed to hearing their voices, they’re more likely to dehumanize them—especially if they disagree with what they say” (147). People only go to sources they trust or that reaffirm their own perspective, which narrows their overall worldview. Zaki reiterates that “when empathy disintegrates online, it’s often because someone designed it to” (149). For example, Russian trolls planted fake news during the 2016 US presidential campaign, increasing tribalism in the US.

While humans often behave poorly on the internet, Zaki also believes that technology can help build empathy. Virtual reality (VR) technology allows an individual to literally see themselves in the body of someone else, like a young girl in a refugee camp in Jordan. This experience forces people to reflect on others’ situations and thoughts, which, in turn, increases their empathy.

New technology, such as Google’s Glass project (“smart glasses”), is another example, allowing people to “literally see their emotions” (155). While much of the public still finds this technology unnerving, it has helped children with autism. Researchers paired Glass with face-tracking technology, which uses artificial intelligence algorithms to parse people’s emotions from their facial expressions. Studies have found that after using this technology (Autism Glass), children with autism better understand how to read others’ emotions. Zaki concludes Chapter 7 by reiterating that while technology has exacerbated polarization and tribalism, it can also create new ways to build empathy.

Epilogue Summary: “The Future of Empathy”

The brief Epilogue concludes the book by having readers think about future generations. Today, most people focus on short-time horizons when making decisions. Yet, the most pressing global issues—such as climate change, overpopulation, and water and food shortages—have long-time horizons. These issues do not appear overnight but slowly build over many years. For this reason, these issues might not impact people living today, but they will impact future generations. Zaki encourages readers to “widen their circle of care to encompass all of humanity” (169), including those living in the future. As he has discussed throughout the book, empathy is a form of self-preservation; caring about others ensures that an individual’s genes survive. While future generations might not know about the sacrifices made by the people of today—which “runs counter to our Darwinian impulses” (173)—Zaki argues that it is a moral imperative that people actively choose empathy. Doing so means there will be a future for humankind.

Appendix A Summary: “What is Empathy?”

While many readers think they know the definition of empathy, Zaki underscores that “we often mean different things when we use it” (179). Empathy researchers have been debating the meaning of this term for decades. Despite these debates, there are multiple forms of empathy. Zaki details three categories of empathy.

The first category refers to sharing other peoples’ feelings. The most famous sharing category is experience sharing, which is when an individual takes on the emotions of other people. Zaki notes that “our brains respond to each other’s pain and pleasure as though we were experiencing those states ourselves” (179). Experience sharing occurs in other animals as well and begins early in life.

The second category is thinking about other peoples’ feelings. Mentalizing, which is when people consider another’s perspective, is one subcategory. Humans are the only animal that can mentalize at a high level because it requires great cognitive power. It takes longer to learn than to engage in experience sharing.

The third and final category is caring about other peoples’ feelings. One caring category is emphatic concern, “or a motivation to improve someone else’s well-being” (180). Of the three categories of empathy, the caring category elicits the most kindness.

These empathetic categories activate at different moments but are also intertwined with one another. Zaki argues that “pinpointing different pieces of empathy helps researchers diagnose what has gone wrong and find the most effective solution” (182). He firmly believes this is the only way to rebuild empathy.

Appendix B Summary: “Evaluating the Evidence”

Zaki believes the “process of predicting, testing, and rethinking” (183) gives science its power. Throughout his book, he provides scientific evidence from the field of psychology to discuss human empathy and kindness. Several high-profile scandals in psychology research have psychologists and researchers in other social science fields concerned about the replicability of their research. These scandals have pushed psychology researchers, including Zaki, to be more transparent about their experiments, findings, and claims.

Appendix B, which Zaki cowrote with his colleague Kari Leibowitz, allows readers to evaluate the main claims in the book. Zaki and Leibowitz summarize the key claims made in each chapter. They then rate the strength of each claim on a 1-5 scale, with 5 being the strongest and 1 being the weakest. Claims given a rating between 1-3 are accompanied by brief explanations. Zaki acknowledges that “the ratings in this appendix are meant to be bite-sized summaries of the strength of evidence for claims in this book” (186). He points readers to The War for Kindness website for additional information on the research used to vet each claim.

A Conversation with Jamil Zaki Summary

In this final section of The War for Kindness, Zaki answers a series of questions. Many of these questions point to the book’s key themes, such as the obstacles to empathy, strategies for building more empathy, and the importance of getting input from people trying to build empathy. Zaki also discusses the title of the book, the supposed fixed nature of empathy, how his parents’ divorce sparked his interest in empathy research, and more. Throughout this section, he reiterates the importance of “spreading our care across not only space but time” (269). Human survival depends on the collective ability to rebuild empathy.

Chapter 7-Appendices Analysis

In the final chapters of The War for Kindness, Zaki focuses on the urgency around rebuilding empathy. Technology is driving human civilization farther apart. Humans are also facing pressing global challenges like climate change, pandemics, and food and water shortages. Many of these challenges do not impact people in their everyday lives, as they are gradual. As a result, people find it difficult (or aren’t willing) to create solutions because they require short-term costs. These elements compound each other, bringing out the worst aspects of human behavior (short-term thinking, tribalism, etc.). Yet, if people want humankind and the planet to survive, they need to rebuild connections with one another.

Whether conscious or not, humans are often blind to suffering. For example, homeless people are often viewed negatively by the majority. In one study, the regions of the brain responsible for empathy did not activate for people when they saw images of the homeless, yet they activated for all other groups. Zaki notes that “acknowledging the experiences of homeless individuals is painful; it induces guilt; it damages the sense that the world is just. Circumstances like these tip the balance in empathy’s tug-of-war, favoring avoidance” (152). In other words, people must actively train themselves to empathize with that which makes them uncomfortable. As established in Chapter 4, books and movies might help people understand the stories of homeless individuals—with virtual reality (VR) potentially being an even greater tool. VR allows people to literally walk in the footsteps of strangers. This technology has been shown to create long-lasting empathy for the homeless. While VR is not a perfect solution, it at least pushes people “to learn more about people they’d otherwise ignore” (155).

Zaki returns to the “fixity” of human nature when discussing autism. Like other aspects of human nature, researchers once believed that individuals with autism would never be able to improve their ability to process and understand emotions. However, numerous studies over the last few decades have demonstrated that this assumption is incorrect. Technology such as Autism Glass, Google Glass (“smart glasses”) paired with face-tracking technology, can help bridge the gap between different ways of experiencing everyday life.

Throughout the book, Zaki is meticulous in documenting the strengths and weaknesses of his cited experiments and studies, even rating the validity of claims in Appendix B. He recognizes that for readers to be receptive to his message, they need to trust him. Being transparent about the scientific process is one way he hopes to build a connection between him and his readers.

At the end of the book, Zaki explains why he frames the need to rebuild empathy as a fight. Humans are in a constant tug-of-war between “forces that push us towards hatred and indifference” (168) and those that “push back against them” (169). This battle is not just for people living today but for future generations. Despite the numerous obstacles impeding the creation of a kinder world, Zaki remains hopeful that people will ultimately choose empathy.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 47 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools